Business ProfileforHi Tech Pharmaceuticals
Current Alerts For This Business
On October 10, 2017 a federal district judge in Atlanta has issued an order finding several defendants, including repeat offender Jared Wheat, in contempt for violating previous court orders related to the sale of weight-loss dietary supplements.
The order imposes a more than $40 million judgment against the defendants, part or all of which the Federal Trade Commission may use to provide refunds to deceived consumers who bought the products.In imposing the monetary sanctions, the court noted that, "The defendants very clearly exhibited a pattern of contemptuous conduct since these proceedings began. (They) dispensed deception to those with the greatest need to believe it, and - not surprisingly - generated a handsome profit for their efforts."
According to the court, the defendants, who ran an operation known as Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., continued to deceptively market dietary supplements with unsubstantiated claims such as "rapid fat loss," "fat burner," "EXTREME WEIGHT LOSS GUARANTEED," and "curbs the appetite," in violation of a 2008 order.
The FTC's case against the defendants began in November 2004, when it filed a complaint charging them with making deceptive claims about the efficacy and safety of "Thermalean" and "Lipodrene," purported weight-loss products containing ephedra, and "Spontane-ES," a supposed erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment containing yohimbine. The complaint named National Urological Group, Inc.; National Institute for Weight Loss, Inc.; Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Wheat; Thomas Holda; Stephen Smith, Michael Howell; and Dr. Terrill Mark Wright.
In December 2008, a federal district court found in favor of the FTC and ordered the defendants to pay $15.8 million, which the FTC has used to provide redress to injured consumers. The court's final order also permanently barred the defendants from claiming that their products cause rapid or substantial weight- or fat loss, or affect body fat, appetite, or metabolism unless the claims are true and supported by scientific evidence.
In November 2011, the FTC sought sanctions against Hi-Tech, Wheat, and Smith for violating the 2008 final order. The FTC alleged that, beginning in 2009, these defendants made prohibited weight-loss claims for four dietary supplements - Fastin, Lipodrene, Benzedrine, and Stimerex-ES -- despite lacking competent and reliable scientific evidence to substantiate those claims. After the defendants appealed a previous ruling by the district court, the case proceeded to trial in the spring of 2017, resulting in the order in favor of the FTC announced today.
The court order finding contempt and imposing the sanctions against Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jared Wheat, Stephen Smith, and Dr. Terrill Mark Wright was issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, on October 10, 2017.
The court has requested that the FTC submit a final order memorializing the sanctions ruling within 20 days of its issuance.
Additional business information
The FTC is mailing a third round of checks totaling more than $8.5 million to people who bought three dietary supplements deceptively marketed by National Urological Group, Inc., Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals and several related companies.
According to the FTC, the defendants made deceptive claims about the efficacy and safety of two supposed weight loss supplements, Thermalean and Lipodrene, and one supposed erectile dysfunction treatment, Spontane-ES.
Previous distributions in this case have resulted in more than $6 million returned to over 100,000 consumers. Because additional money became available, the FTC is sending a third round of checks. All affected consumers were eligible to receive a total refund of $102.32. Some consumers in this mailing already received partial refunds and will now receive the remainder they are due.
If you receive a check, please cash it within 60 days.
If you have any questions, or If you do not get a check, but believe that you should have, please contact the refund administrator 1-877-483-2883.
For additional information please visit:
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/022-3165/national-urological-group-inc-et-al
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/refunds/national-urological-refunds
At-a-glance
Related Categories
Business Details
- Headquarters
- 6015 Unity Dr Ste B, Norcross, GA 30071-3575
- BBB File Opened:
- 12/1/1997
- Years in Business:
- 31
- Business Started:
- 1/1/1993
- Type of Entity:
- Sole Proprietorship
- Contact Information
Principal
- Mr. Jared Wheat, President
- Additional Contact Information
Fax Numbers
- (770) 797-9960Primary Fax
Phone Numbers
- (888) 855-7919Other Phone
Email Addresses
- Primary
- (770) 797-9960
Customer Complaints
0 Customer Complaints
Need to file a complaint? BBB is here to help. We'll guide you through the process. How BBB Processes Complaints and Reviews
File a ComplaintBBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation.